|Home | Articles | News | Blog | About | Mailing List | Resources | Prominent Islamists | Middle East Forum | Keep Us Informed | Donate|
British Security Going to the Dogs?
by David J. Rusin • Jul 1, 2008 at 11:19 am
Due to their ability to detect explosives and illegal drugs, specially trained dogs provide essential services to a range of security and law enforcement agencies. Moreover, canines could not care less about a person's race or religion, thus limiting claims of bias against the organizations that employ them.
But what if a religious group objects to the use of dogs on the grounds that they are unclean animals? Must the whole of society be placed at risk in deference to the customs of a few? The answers should be obvious, but the questions are all too real in Britain:
The report is based on tests of various security measures put in place after the 2005 London bombings. Incidentally, Muslims also balked at body scanning technology during the trials. "Sometimes I wear clothing which is not so tight," one woman noted. "It will be shown on [the monitor] and somebody is looking at it. It defeats the whole purpose of me covering up."
The British Transport Police have wisely rejected these demands and pledged to continue using dogs in security checks. "The legislation applies to everyone. It's not a case for exemptions," an agency spokesman said. "Officers will be sensitive where appropriate but obviously there are practical implications."
These "practical implications" are rarely of concern to Islamists, who fight frequent battles against man's best friend. Among the recent lowlights: Muslim taxi drivers declining to carry passengers with seeing-eye dogs and a Minnesota student threatening to kill his classmate's medical assistance dog.
The above stories have two aspects in common: the use of animals to protect or improve people's lives, and attempts by a minority to grossly violate the rights of others. While every dog has its day, we must ensure that such brazen infringements never have theirs.