|Home | Articles | News | Blog | About | Mailing List | Resources | Prominent Islamists | Middle East Forum | Keep Us Informed | Donate|
by David J. Rusin • May 15, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Islamists can be rather sensitive about cartoons. In early 2006, worldwide riots erupted in response to caricatures of Mohammed that had been published by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten several months prior. Recent cases in Canada and the U.S. demonstrate that lawful Islamists have taken up the burden of enforcing doodle dhimmitude.
At the behest of a local Muslim group, police in Halifax, Nova Scotia, have opened a hate crime investigation over a cartoon that mocks a couple demanding compensation for a terrorism probe.
An official at the paper rightly noted that the drawing does not take aim at all Muslims and therefore cannot be a hate crime under Canadian law: "The whole purpose of that cartoon was to comment on the outrageous demands of this individual for compensation long before any hearing into her case had ever been held."
The Chronicle Herald may have learned a lesson from the Columbus Dispatch. Last year, the Ohio office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations complained that the paper had published what CAIR-OH called a "Nazi-style" cartoon that shows cockroaches emerging from a grate marked "extremism" at the general location of Iran.
The Dispatch hammered CAIR for promoting a "false grievance," as the roaches are clearly not referring to Iranians in general. Those who wrote letters at the urging of the pressure group received this dressing-down in response:
When CAIR and friends try to manufacture controversy, it's best just to "toon" them out.