|Home | Articles | News | Blog | About | Mailing List | Resources | Prominent Islamists | Middle East Forum | Keep Us Informed | Donate|
Competing Speech Rights Debated at Irvine Trial
Defense arguments in the Irvine 11 trial continued into their second day Wednesday, with attorneys arguing their clients' actions constituted protected speech and are not a crime. Other witnesses were called to testify on behalf of the defendants' character or to discuss how other university protests allowed for a greater right to disrupt without the fear of academic sanction or arrest.
Ten of the 11 students arrested for an orchestrated series of disruptions during a February 2010 speech at the University of California, Irvine by Israeli ambassador Michael Oren are on trial facing misdemeanor charges. Despite repeated admonitions from university officials, the students continued to interrupt Oren, reading from prepared note cards as their supporters cheered.
What happened at the speech is not really in dispute. The issue is whether the episode violated the law. Prosecutors charged the group with conspiracy. The disruptions were plotted by members of the Muslim Student Union, a chapter of the national Muslim Students Association (MSA), emails exchanged among the students show.
Note: The content of external articles does not necessarily reflect the views of Islamist Watch.