|Home | Articles | News | Blog | About | Mailing List | Resources | Prominent Islamists | Middle East Forum | Keep Us Informed | Donate|
Appeals court sides with inmate's wish for Muslim-diet meals
by Howard Fischer
PHOENIX — Arizona prison officials need to show a real hardship if they want to deny religiously permissible meals to a Muslim inmate, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday.
In a unanimous ruling, the judges overturned a lower-court decision that upheld claims by the state Department of Corrections that providing the halal meals to Amin Shakur would create additional costs and administrative burdens. The appellate judges said there was no evidence that the state actually looked into the real cost.
The judges also noted that the state already provides two kinds of kosher meals for Jewish inmates. That, they said, not only raises questions about whether the state has a reason for its disparate treatment between Jewish and Muslim prisoners, but also casts "substantial doubt" on the state's claims that accommodating Shakur and other Muslim inmates would cause problems.
Note: The content of external articles does not necessarily reflect the views of Islamist Watch.